| Books-Commentary - Isaac Asimov |
Did Isaac Asimov lose his touch towards the end in the Robots and Foundations series?
Remember the Lucky Starr series? They were short, and had action. Remember the early Foundation series? A collection of short stories that proceeded at a reasonable pace. Remember the early Robot books? They were constantly on the move, solving mysteries and having adventures.
Now remember the later Foundation and Robot books. They... were... so... slow... The talk-to-action ratio went up 500% and very little happened, and his stories had all the excitement of a pair of academics holding a 300 page theoretical discussion (Golan Trevize and Janov Patheticrat come to mind). Do you think that as Asimov ran out of energy his characters did too?
|
Click here to post a message
|
The commentator io
posts on 9/12/2005 9:24:00 PM
See, there are two kinds of novels I can think of. On one hand, there's the action-oriented novel, where the charachters are sort of standardized and seem to be there just in order to carry out the plot of the story: their talks are rather task-oriented, very little is left to the charachters themselves as people (why, as ordinary people too).On the other hand, there's the character-oriented novel, where talks, descriptions outnumber the action (it comes to fall short sometimes) and the plot seems to adjust itself to the exigences of the characters: they have the chance to show their personalities, to fathom some subjects and so to explain what lies behind the action (because, in a novel, action itself must be explained and fathomed to be something more than a superficial report of events). That's why I tend to prefer the character-oriented novel (it seems to me that the action-oriented novels lack something to be complete) and that's why I like Asimov's style in his late books (I'm not talking about the plots themselves, this is just a matter of style)
|
Eric Voorhies
posts on 8/11/2005 4:43:12 AM
Asimov was a firm believer in the idea that thought and discussion are more important in the long run than action. His protagonists were usually thinker/tacticians who figured out how to get big results from small changes- either that, or the protagonists were bit players in the actual unfolding of events.
His early stories were somewhat MORE active, true. Later on, he wrote more novels and fewer short stories. A writer always emphasizes characterization and dialogue more in a novel than in a novella or short story (if said writer is any good). Asimov was dialogue-heavy in the shorter stories, so it's no surprise that his characters grew wordy enough to put people off when he wrote actual novels.
|
Click here to post a message
|
|
Other Recent Isaac Asimov Discussions
Isaac Asimov 1/20/2009 4:18:01 PM
Was Psychohistory Actually Workable? 6/30/2008 5:23:18 AM
Were robots forced to fake orgasms under Isaac Asimov's Three Law of Robotics? 3/31/2008 5:35:27 PM
Isaac Asimov Foundation Series: What's with the group consciousness and hermaphrodite robots? 5/4/2006 10:15:00 PM
The 3 Laws of Robotics 2/17/2006 10:09:57 PM
Did Isaac Asimov lose his touch towards the end in the Robots and Foundations series? 9/12/2005 9:24:00 PM
What's with all the sex with robots? 8/11/2005 4:26:46 AM
Note: the views expressed here are only those of the posters.
|
| Try our new Star Wars & Star Trek puzzle pictures!
Click here
Advertise with us
Feedback
Star Wars Revenge of the Sith plot spoilers
Hobbits
The politics game
The lawyer game
Games:
Trivia Masters!
Rescue your favorite scifi characters from slavery!
Talk to your favorite scifi characters!
Eating New Yorkers Computer Game
Pomeranians
Most recent TV & Movie discussions:
Charmed: Is Piper really a Halliwell? 11/13/2009 11:30:45 AM
Lord of the Rings: Why would Aragorn choose pig lips Arwen Evenstar over Eowyn? 11/12/2009 6:40:39 PM
Xena: 37 reasons why Xena and Gabrielle are... you know.... 11/12/2009 7:23:13 AM
A Boy and His Dog: A Boy and His Dog 11/11/2009 11:48:16 PM
Battlestar Galactica: Was Battlestar Galactica politically conservative? 11/1/2009 9:51:45 AM
Battlestar Galactica: Why were the Cylons so slow and thinking impaired? 10/31/2009 8:36:52 PM
Blade Runner: Blade Runner 10/22/2009 2:43:11 AM
Star Trek Enterprise: Jolene Blalock on T'Pol and Star Trek Enterprise 10/19/2009 2:48:46 PM
Charmed: If Piper Halliwell gets pregnant, can Leo give her an abortion? 10/3/2009 12:29:33 PM
Star Wars: Why did stormtroopers wear armor that didn't work against blasters? 9/30/2009 9:48:47 PM
Newest slaves:
Mrs. Robinson Mark II
4:51:12 AM
Pierce Brosnan Bond
4:49:40 AM
Octopussy
4:49:09 AM
Darth Maul
4:47:27 AM
Moonbase sexpot
4:46:06 AM
Slutty Sword Girl
4:43:22 AM
Timothy Dalton Bond
4:41:26 AM
Colonel Lake
4:38:49 AM
Warrant Officer Ellen Ripley
4:37:19 AM
Luke Skywalker
4:36:32 AM
All slaves (click here)
Celebrity interviews:
President George W. Bush 6:32:00 PM
Jan-Michael Vincent 2:16:51 PM
Captain Kathryn Janeway 3:47:46 PM
Jack ONeill (Richard Dean Anderson) 1:39:22 PM
Jennifer Aniston (Friends) 5:01:07 PM
All celebrities (click here)
|