science fiction
Trivia (click here): Wedge Antilles rebuilt Rouge Squardron. What other unit did he build?

TV-Commentary - Star Wars
Why AT-AT's are retarded
AT-AT's are visually very impressive. They make big clumping sounds as they walk. But they were the wrong weapons for the attack on Hoth. The goal was to destroy the shield generators as quickly as possible before the rebels escaped, right? Then is the solution really to send down these big tanks that move... very... very.... slowly... one step at a time? Wouldn't it have been better to send fast moving hovercraft skiffs like those from Return of the Jedi to zoom in and blast the shield generator?

Or better yet, why not TIE fighters? If the Rebel fighters could fly under the shield generator at low altitudes, why couldn't TIE fighters fly around and under and do the same?



Click here to post a message




       Gate Angel posts on 6/2/2009 4:50:44 PM

You guys are forgetting they did force the rebels to find a new base it took them minths to find hoth and the rebels now no longer had a strike base they also killed many rebels


       Dragead posts on 4/12/2009 1:35:53 PM

in response to stabby, i'm pretty sure that they had the technology to allow space ships to travel in atmosphere. Remember in episode one and four? The Naboo fighters and the x-wings and y-wings were "Space fighters", yet they took off from the ground, in atmosphere.


       staby posts on 7/24/2008 12:55:36 AM

starfighters cannot manover in an atmosphere, they where not designed for it, it would wreck the handling of the vehicle and destroy the atmosphere. starfighters where designed to work in the void of space. also, they needed something powerful like the All terrain armored transport to cut through the base's defenses, a motified luxory skiff like Jabba had would be blown to bits, remember how it was destoryed with one shot?


       Gabe posts on 7/8/2008 2:58:31 PM

If you had read some of the books, you would know that AT-ATs actually move more in one step than a human could run in 5 minutes. They just look slow.


       whatever posts on 4/18/2008 10:24:59 AM

on the planet the rebels did have a good defence the big walkers were the only vehicle that could survive unharmed(reletively) im sure vader just wanted to minamise his losses.


       Darth Frogger.... posts on 1/29/2008 11:15:25 PM

One thing we must remember if we decide to look at this from a battle and "realisctic" p.o.v. is that not all plans are perfect. Veers (and Vader) chose the ATAT's for all the points mentioned, and were hoping on luck that they would be fast enough to get the rebls by surprise. Remember Vader killed piett (i think it was him) for jumping out of light speed to early and giving the rebels time to organises.


       The commentator posts on 7/27/2006 4:16:14 PM

they were not worried about the rebels running. you will remember that there were star destroyers in space waiting for them and a commander said "our first catch of the day" but their plan didn't work because of the ion cannon.


       The commentator posts on 7/13/2006 6:22:12 PM

How were the legs maneuvered on the AT-AT? Were there levers in the cockpit that controlled the legs?


       rand posts on 3/1/2006 11:21:07 PM

one thing i've always enjoyed about mr. lucas' star wars movies is that he has this wild imagination that makes it easy to suspend your disbelief and enjoy the ride. he also tells a good story. i think all the different vehicles and alien species only add to the fun, and that's what GOOD science fiction is all about. i also like the alien pop singer in the opening of jedi. what was her name, snookums, or something like that? take care.


       The commentator Bang Bang posts on 3/1/2006 3:32:25 AM

DL77002 has a good point. Personally, when I first saw "The Empire Strikes Back," I never thought that George Lucas introduced the Imperial Walkers simply because they looked "cool." (Although they did!) Apparently, the shield generator could only protect a certain part of the planet, so the Walkers were landed at some distant location of Hoth--far away from the shield generator--and began their slow, cumbersome march towards the rebel base. I used to wonder what would have happened had the Hoth landscape been mountainous; obviously, the AT-ATs would've toppled over. But let's not forget, Darth Vader had a huge fleet of stardestroyers, and probably a large assortment of attack vehicles on board to choose from depending on the terrain. When he saw the surface of Hoth was relatively flat, he sent in the Walkers. The weaponry on the TIE Fighters would not have sufficed to take out the generator. We must remember that George Lucas had the double duty of presenting us with a fantastic battle that had some logic to it, but not one that simply repeated scenes from the first Star Wars. This, he did well. Mr. Lucas is responsible for sci-fi being what it is today, and I think we should defer to him and trust him on certain ideas that we might take issue with. Without him, the world would be a lonely place today. Have a good day, everyone.


       DL77002 posts on 3/1/2006 2:45:12 AM

2 good questions, both of which I do now know the answer to nor did I even bring them up in my complaint. What I was complaining about is those of you who claim Lucas chooses "pretty lights" over logic. Why did the rebels use snowspeeder instead of x-wings? Perhaps snowspeeders are easier to maneuver in tighter quarters? Perhaps snowspeeders are much smaller and are better for group ground asaults? Perhaps as I said, this is just cinema and Lucas wanted to introduce a new vehicle to offer something new to the arsenal for the viewers to enjoy. I do not know - but again, as far as the AT-ATs only being there because Lucas is big on effects, I very much disagree.


       rand posts on 2/28/2006 11:22:32 PM

all i wanted to know was how did those big walkers get down to the planet to attack the rebel base, and why did the rebels have snow speeders that didn't like the cold when they had x-wings built to perform in the much colder void of space? i thought they were two perfectly good questions. take care.


       DL77002 posts on 2/27/2006 9:02:46 PM

This is almost dumber than the "how does Darth Vader eat" question. No, the AT-ATs are not retarded, but whoever said "lucas does not want you to think reason just enjoy the preety lights" certinaly is. Sure, 'Star Wars' is not 'Star Trek' but the pretty lights statement by commentrian is a point in the fight for pro-abortion. The AT-ATs moved slowly because of the amount of armor they were equipped with, you are forgetting that the rebel's blasters did not even penetrate these tanks; you seem to be forgetting that this is the rebel's base they were attacking, the place the rebels chose to set up their complicated and powerful air and ground defense weapons. Sending in the "fast moving hovercraft skiffs like those from Return of the Jedi" would not have done much good as the sensors would have picked it up and they would have blown it to pieces. Again, this is the rebel's BASE the empire planned on infiltrating, this could not have been a surprise attack as fast moving vehicles would not have done a thing. Why did you suggest TIE fighters? The AT-ATs were there to destroy the shield generator. SHIELD generator. They were not trying to destroy their cable tv, or pour salt on their front lawn, they were trying to destroy the shield generator which generally keeps things from entering the planet's atmosphere. Something else I guess you guys missed while watching the "pretty lights" is the science behind which vehicles are slow, which are fast, and why. The "hovercrafts from Return of the Jedi" and the TIE fighters were so incredibly fast because they had very minmal weaponry onboard to weigh things down. Any vehicle that could travel as quickly as the "pretty lights" you guys obviously want to see, would have traveled so quickly because of it's weak offensive and defensive systems. The shield generator was tough to destroy because it was heavily guarded and heavily shielded, not because the rebels hid it behind a bush. The AT-AT, while being slow; was incapable of being brought down by firpower, very capable of destroying the shield generator with it's on-board weaponry, and while giving the rebels plenty of time to escape, still brought the shield down long enough for Vader and his troops to get to the planet's surface. The most important thing you guys have to realize is that Lucas creates cinema. Cin-e-ma. Accusing Lucas of wanting you to "just enjoy the pretty lights and not use logic" is a ridiculous statement, as half of his job requirement as a science-fiction movie maker is making pretty lights for you to watch in the first place. The logic was written way before the light bulbs were screwed in, so please screw in yours.


       commentrian posts on 2/19/2006 1:38:54 AM

friends friends ..lucas does not want you to think reason just enjoy the preety lights ...


       rand posts on 2/19/2006 12:50:03 AM

i have a few questions about the empired strikes back that darth frogger brought to mind with his question about the snow speeders. if the empire attacked hoth from space, how did all the giagantic walkers get on the planet's surface. and did the empire send tie fighters against the snow speeders? it's been years since i've watched empire so my memory is a little vague. but if it did, how could fighters designed to function in the coldness of space freeze up in hoth's much warmer atmosphere. and why did the rebels bother with snow speeders that needed to be adjusted to work in the cold when they had xwings fighters also designed to function in deep space temperatures? take care.


       aliciaskywalker posts on 2/18/2006 12:47:40 PM

Read Rogue Squadron, people. The AT ATS were very effective. They WON, didn't they? My goodness.


       Darth Frogger Of Australia (Aussie Aussie Aussie!) posts on 2/16/2006 7:01:44 PM

Why look at it in reality? it spoils the fun!


       darth taiter posts on 2/16/2006 6:23:52 PM

the empire sent in the painfully slow and retarded AT-AT's to give the heroes time to escape.If they had sent in fighters to knock out the sheilds then blasted the base from orbit killing everyone, then that would have been the end of a very profitable venture for mr Lucas....wouldn't it.


       Darth Frogger Of Australia (Aussie Aussie Aussie!) posts on 2/16/2006 6:21:27 AM

Didnt the Rebles have to ajust the Snowspeeders for the cold? So the empier sends in fighters, they frieeze over rendering them useless! (Exuse the spelling)


       Wookimonsta posts on 2/12/2006 10:18:32 AM

The thing is that ATAT's chin guns are very powerful, and faster tanks would not have the kind of firepower to destroy the shield generator, let alone the lack of armor that allowed ATATs advance to easily through the rebel lines of defense.


Click here to post a message

Click Here for Messages:    1 - 20   21 - 40   41 - 60  

Other Recent Star Wars Discussions

Why did stormtroopers wear armor that didn't work against blasters? 9/30/2009 9:48:47 PM

Why AT-AT's are retarded 6/2/2009 4:50:44 PM

Did they or did they not have Interdictor Cruisers? 4/12/2009 9:08:58 PM

Which is stronger, Darth Vader/the Force or the Death Star? 4/12/2009 1:39:12 PM

Did Luke become a Jedi in a week of training? 4/12/2009 1:31:16 PM

Why did they need a floating syringe to interrogate Princess Leia? 12/26/2008 4:35:23 PM

Star Wars 10/15/2008 12:42:27 AM

Why couldn't R2 speak English? 7/26/2008 12:08:28 AM

Why didn't Tie Fighters have shields? 7/26/2008 12:05:22 AM

Why didn't the Rebels evacuate Yavin IV as a precaution? 7/24/2008 1:56:05 AM

Was Boba Fett paid by the word? 7/24/2008 1:48:40 AM

What did Yoda do every day? 7/24/2008 1:42:57 AM

How did the Death Star move? 7/24/2008 1:34:16 AM

Does going over to the dark side give you bad teeth and skin? 7/24/2008 1:29:55 AM

Really safe to leave Luke with Darth Vader's brother? 7/24/2008 1:23:42 AM

How did the Rebels beat the Imperial fleet in Return of the Jedi? 7/23/2008 9:11:35 PM

Would Leia have stuck with Luke were it not for the Incest Problem? 6/25/2008 10:51:00 PM

How did Darth Vader eat lunch? 8/13/2007 6:08:32 AM

Do Jedi dress like Tattooine dirt farmers, or vice versa? 3/12/2006 4:17:50 AM

Why does Stormtrooper armor have space for breasts? 2/19/2006 10:37:58 PM


Note: the views expressed here are only those of the posters.
Try our new Star Wars & Star Trek puzzle pictures! Click here

Advertise with us
Feedback
Star Wars Revenge of the Sith plot spoilers
Hobbits
The politics game
The lawyer game

3 Movie search options!
1) Simple lookup
(title or author)

or
2) Detailed movie search
(click here)
or

3) One-click plot searches! Simply click on a plot below!

Animal Story

Clones

Coming of age

Cultural problems, alien culture

Explore/1st contact/ enviro story

Family relations

GIANT monster(s)

Horror story?

Inner Struggle

Lifeform altered?

Mental/magical powers focus

Parody

Political power play

Religious overtones?

Repressive society story

Robots, Computers, VR

Romance

Spying & Investigations

Tech./$$$/Info hunt

Time Travel story?

Training/Apprent.

War or Invasion


Games:
Trivia Masters!

Rescue your favorite
scifi characters from
slavery!


Talk to your favorite
scifi characters!


Eating New Yorkers
Computer Game


Pomeranians

Most recent TV & Movie discussions:

Charmed: Is Piper really a Halliwell? 11/13/2009 11:30:45 AM

Lord of the Rings: Why would Aragorn choose pig lips Arwen Evenstar over Eowyn? 11/12/2009 6:40:39 PM

Xena: 37 reasons why Xena and Gabrielle are... you know.... 11/12/2009 7:23:13 AM

A Boy and His Dog: A Boy and His Dog 11/11/2009 11:48:16 PM

Battlestar Galactica: Was Battlestar Galactica politically conservative? 11/1/2009 9:51:45 AM

Battlestar Galactica: Why were the Cylons so slow and thinking impaired? 10/31/2009 8:36:52 PM

Blade Runner: Blade Runner 10/22/2009 2:43:11 AM

Star Trek Enterprise: Jolene Blalock on T'Pol and Star Trek Enterprise 10/19/2009 2:48:46 PM

Charmed: If Piper Halliwell gets pregnant, can Leo give her an abortion? 10/3/2009 12:29:33 PM

Star Wars: Why did stormtroopers wear armor that didn't work against blasters? 9/30/2009 9:48:47 PM


Newest slaves:
Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) 5:20:58 AM
Jaime Sommers 5:18:31 AM
Steve Austin 5:17:55 AM
Kai 5:12:03 AM
Wonder Woman 5:11:45 AM
Mrs. Robinson Mark II 5:11:25 AM
Professor Robinson 5:07:22 AM
Slutty Sword Girl 5:00:31 AM
Octopussy 4:59:29 AM
Roger Moore Bond 4:58:25 AM
All slaves
(click here)


Celebrity interviews:
President George W. Bush 6:32:00 PM
Jan-Michael Vincent 2:16:51 PM
Captain Kathryn Janeway 3:47:46 PM
Jack ONeill (Richard Dean Anderson) 1:39:22 PM
Jennifer Aniston (Friends) 5:01:07 PM
All celebrities
(click here)